About ANLite

http://anlitemedia.com

ANLite surge no âmbito de um projeto de investigação em curso de Maria José Brites sobre Jovens, Participação e Literacia e jornalismo (ANLite: Audiências, Notícias e Literacia, financiado pela Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, SFRH/BPD/92204/2013). Maria José Brites é Professora Auxiliar na ULP – Universidade Lusófona do Porto e investigadora integrada do CECS – Centro de Estudos de Comunicação e Sociedade, na Universidade do Minho, onde realiza pós-doutoramento em Ciências da Comunicação (SFRH/BPD/92204/2013). Foi coordenadora em Portugal (2013-2014) do projeto RadioActive Europe (531245-LLP-1-2012-1-UK-KA3-KA3). É membro de duas ações Cost (COST IS1401 European Literacy Network e COST IS1410 DigitLitEY) e de um projeto europeu (Cross-media news repertoires as democratic resources). Integra a rede CEDAR - Consortium on Emerging Directions in Audience Research. Concluiu o doutoramento em Ciências da Comunicação (2013), na Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas da Universidade Nova de Lisboa. Os interesses de pesquisa incluem áreas como os estudos da juventude, jornalismo e participação, estudos de audiências, literacia para as notícias e literacia cívica. | ANLite appears within the scope of an ongoing research conducted by Maria José Brites on Youth, Participation and Literacy and journalism (ANLite: Audiences, News and Literacy, funded by the Portuguese Funding Agency for Science, SFRH/BPD/92204/2013). Maria José Brites is Assistant professor at ULP – Lusophone University of Porto and postdoctoral researcher in Communication Sciences at CECS – Communication and Society Research Centre, Minho University, with a grant from the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (SFRH/BPD/92204/2013). She coordinated (in Portugal) the RadioActive project (531245-LLP-1-2012-1-UK-KA3-KA3). She is a member of three research networks (CEDAR - Consortium on Emerging Directions in Audience Research, COST IS1401 European Literacy Network and COST IS1410 DigitLitEY) and one cross-national collaborative project (Cross-media news repertoires as democratic resources). She concluded her PhD in Communication Sciences in the New University of Lisbon in 2013 with a research entitled “The place of the news in the construction of participation (political and civic) among young citizens in Portugal (2010-2011)”. Her research interests include issues as Youth, journalism and participation, Audience studies and News and civic literacy. She worked as journalist in several newspapers and magazines in Portugal (press card 3182).

Posts by ANLite

Social Inequality, Childhood and the Media: A Longitudinal Study of the Mediatization of Socialisation | Ingrid Paus-HasebrinkJasmin KultererPhilip Sinner | SpringerLink

. Metodologias, Publicação . ,

“This open access book presents a qualitative longitudinal panel-study on child and adolescent socialisation in socially disadvantaged families. The study traces how children and their parents make sense of media within the context of their everyday life over twelve years (from 2005 to 2017) and provides a unique perspective on the role of different socialisation contexts, drawing on rich data from a broad range of qualitative methods. Using a theoretical framework and methodological approach that can be applied transnationally, it sheds light on the complex interplay of factors which shape children’s socialisation and media usage in multiple ways.” Continue reading →

Public Sphere Participation Online: the Ambiguities of Affect | Peter Dahlgren | Cairn.info

. Democracia .

Public Sphere Participation Online: the Ambiguities of Affect, Cairn.info, de Peter Dahlgren. professor Emérito da Universidade de Lund.

“Debates about the internet’s contributions to the public sphere and democracy took off almost as soon as going online was becoming a mass phenomenon in the mid-1990s. Today, more than two decades later, we are certainly not close to any consensus, but most would agree that the initial celebratory crescendos have dissipated. Skeptics such as Mozorov (2011) can find plenty of evidence for not putting much hope in the internet’s potential for saving or even enhancing democracy. Continue reading →